Commentary for Bava Batra 296:9

לא בשעמד

— No; where he recovered.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And desires to withdraw the gifts. The first cannot retain possession because when the gift was made to him the testator was left with nothing. The right of ownership on the part of the second is discussed in the Gemara infra. ');">²³</span> Logical reasoning also supports this [view];<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the Baraitha cited refers to a case of recovery. ');">²⁴</span> since the final clause reads: [If he gave] a part of his possessions<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'of them'. ');">²⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Batra 296:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.